Common Ground
Angus: The path to consistency.
January 2, 2025
Think of any old photograph of a sale barn or feedyard. Cattle in all shapes, sizes and colors dotted the pens. Variability was the norm with many “mongrelized” cow herds and calf crops. More than 80 distinct breeds contributed to the nation’s cow herd.
While rich in its genetic potential, this diversity often led to inconsistent carcasses, unpredictable beef quality and inefficiencies in the supply chain. To no surprise, consumer beef demand was slipping every year.
During the past three decades, however, the Angus breed has emerged as a unifying force, bringing much-needed consistency and reliability to a previously disjointed system.
Mixing it up
In the 1970s and 1980s, crossbreeding was heavily promoted and hailed as the solution to improving efficiency and productivity in cattle operations. Producers sought to capitalize on hybrid vigor by combining breeds and optimizing traits like growth rate, fertility and longevity. However, an unintended consequence of widespread crossbreeding was increased variability in cattle type and carcass quality, ultimately leading to decreased consumer satisfaction.
Different breeds brought differing strengths — and weaknesses — to the table. For instance, while some European breeds excelled in growth and muscle development, they often introduced calving difficulties and lacked the marbling that drives flavor.
Conversely, other breeds strong in maternal traits or hardiness struggled to put on enough pounds and gain efficiently. Bos indicus breeds were used to introduce heat tolerance, but they brought along inconsistencies in tenderness. The lack of standardization meant beef quality could vary widely — not just between operations, but within a single herd.
A true solution
The Angus breed provided a solution to this problem. As a British breed, Angus cattle were already prized for their calving ease, mothering ability, marbling and adaptability to diverse environments. On top of that, Angus breeders were early adopters of performance testing and utilization of expected progeny differences (EPDs) and technologies like artificial insemination.
By doing so, Angus breeders found genetic outliers in scale that combined calving ease, maternal strength, growth traits and carcass merit. The breed’s ability to accurately describe these traits with data and predictability reduced the variability created by crossbreeding. Commercial producers could simplify multitrait genetic progress by using one breed.
Backed by consumers
The rise of the Certified Angus Beef (CAB) program in 1978 also marked a turning point in the industry’s focus on consistency. Beyond just turning the nation’s cow herd black, CAB’s stringent quality standards for marbling, maturity and carcass size provided a clear and measurable target for producers. Cattle with Angus genetics were naturally better-suited to meet these standards, reinforcing the breed’s value as a tool for reducing variability.
CAB’s success also sent a powerful message to the industry: Consumers are willing to pay a premium for consistent, high-quality beef. This economic incentive drove producers to adopt Angus genetics at an unprecedented rate. By the early 2000s, Angus had become the dominant breed in the U.S. cattle industry, effectively displacing many lesser-performing breeds and stabilizing the genetic base of the national herd.
In practical terms, this means fewer outliers across the entire beef supply chain today, and outliers cost money. Cattle feeders with pens of more-similar genetics can more effectively manage to an optimum end point. Processors can now count on more consistent carcass weights and marbling scores, enabling the growth of quality-focused branded programs like CAB. Also, retailers benefit from a reliable product that meets consumer expectations every time.
Today, the influence of Angus genetics can be seen across nearly all facets of U.S. beef production. Whether in purebred or crossbred herds, the Angus breed has allowed the industry to focus on continuous improvement rather than damage control caused by extreme inconsistency. It’s hard to put a price on that, but I am confident that the value is significant.